[lime-users] setting one mesh device as gateway? (and nanostation M2 update)
nico at libre.ws
Wed May 10 13:37:17 UTC 2017
On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 15:34 +0200, Nk via lime-users wrote:
> AHAHAHAH epic.
> Thanks Ilario, sorry to bother. My tests were first router’s LAN to
> second router’s WAN, and that wasn’t working. Are you saying they
> should be connected LAN to LAN [as an alternative to WAN to WAN which
> we know works perfectly]? Wouldn’t that cause a DHCP conflict?
Not at all. That is the default behaviour of LibreMesh (crazy, right?
> Thank you.
> On May 10, 2017, 3:33 PM +0200, Ilario Gelmetti <iochesonome at gmail.co
> m>, wrote:
> > On 05/10/2017 02:20 PM, Nikksno via lime-users wrote:
> > > If I use the eth1 of the first router to mesh with other routers
> > > as
> > > you're suggesting, the problem is that the meshing doesn't seem
> > > to
> > > happen correctly, as bmx6 shows the second router's route as
> > > being eth1,
> > > but batman shows all routes to other nodes being over wlan mesh,
> > > even to
> > > the second router.
> > It's not lan, it's not wan...
> > It's BATWAN nananananananananananananananana batwaaaaaannn
> > No, seriously, I expected batman was present on ethernet LAN
> > interfaces...
> > They're also included in br-lan which is included in bat0, no?
> > Can you post these?
> > # brctl show
> > # batctl if
> > I agree with nicopace, lan to lan should work.
> > @devs pls? Are ethernet ports with LAN proto not used by batman-
> > adv?
> > _______________________________________________
> > lime-users mailing list
> > lime-users at lists.libremesh.org
> > https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
> lime-users mailing list
> lime-users at lists.libremesh.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the lime-users